13F data — long US equity only · ~45-day lag from quarter-end · positions may have changed since · not investment advice
← Strongest buys
87

MSFT

MICROSOFT CORP · Information Technology

Consensus score 87/100 · #2 this quarter · tier-weighted across tracked managers

DivergingPrice action since filingas of 2026-07-10
vs 50-day avg
-4.6%
21-day momentum
-4.5%
recent volume
1.35×

13F filings lag ~45 days; this is current price/volume action on top — a technical read, not a prediction.

S4· DecliningStage Analysis · Weinstein
vs 30-wk avg
-8.3%
30-wk MA slope
-3.7%
rel. strength
-15.6
52-wk range
17%

Declining — below a falling 30-week trend, lagging the market. Weinstein says avoid. Based on the 30-week (150-day) moving average + slope, Mansfield relative strength vs SPY, and volume. Technical read, not advice.

Holders
21
tracked managers
New this Q
1
opened a position
Avg weight
4.5%
of their portfolios
Combined value
$10.34B
held, at quarter-end

Who’s holding it Q1 2026, by position size

ManagerPosition sizeChange
Altarock Partners
Quality compounder
16.8%
TRIM
Pershing Square
Activist
15.3%
NEW
Triple Frond Partners
Concentrated
13.6%
HOLD
Polen Capital
Quality growth
7.3%
TRIM
Fundsmith
Concentrated
6.0%
HOLD
Wedgewood Partners
Quality growth
5.7%
TRIM
AKO Capital
Concentrated
5.3%
TRIM
Eagle Capital
Quality value
5.0%
ADD
Yacktman Asset Management
Quality value
4.9%
ADD
Tiger Global Management
Concentrated
4.1%
TRIM
Cantillon Capital
Concentrated
2.7%
TRIM
Viking Global Investors
Concentrated
2.4%
TRIM
TCI Fund Management
Quality compounder
2.2%
TRIM
Hound Partners
Concentrated
2.2%
ADD
Markel Group
Concentrated
1.7%
HOLD
Davis Advisors
Concentrated
0.1%
ADD
Horizon Kinetics
Franchise/inflation
0.0%
TRIM
Giverny Capital
Quality compounder
0.0%
ADD
Brave Warrior
Concentrated
0.0%
ADD
Gardner Russo & Quinn
Graham/global value
0.0%
TRIM
Ruane Cunniff / Sequoia
Quality compounder
0.0%
ADD

Position size = share of that manager’s reported long US-equity portfolio. The consensus score weights each holder by quality tier, position size, and whether they were buying or trimming — then discounts very crowded names. It measures agreement among these managers, not expected return.