13F data — long US equity only · ~45-day lag from quarter-end · positions may have changed since · not investment advice
← Strongest buys
70

MSFT

MICROSOFT CORP · Information Technology

Consensus score 70/100 · #10 this quarter · tier-weighted across tracked managers

↑ConfirmedPrice action since filingas of 2026-10-14
vs 50-day avg
+5.9%
21-day momentum
+7.4%
recent volume
0.72×

13F filings lag ~45 days; this is current price/volume action on top — a technical read, not a prediction.

S2· AdvancingStage Analysis · Weinstein
vs 30-wk avg
+22.6%
30-wk MA slope
+3.8%
rel. strength
-3.6
52-wk range
90%

Advancing — above a rising 30-week trend with positive relative strength. Weinstein’s buy zone. Based on the 30-week (150-day) moving average + slope, Mansfield relative strength vs SPY, and volume. Technical read, not advice.

Holders
21
tracked managers
New this Q
1
opened a position
Avg weight
4.3%
of their portfolios
Combined value
$8.40B
held, at quarter-end

Who’s holding it Q2 2026, by position size

ManagerPosition sizeChange
Altarock Partners
Quality compounder
20.5%
ADD
Pershing Square
Activist
11.9%
ADD
Triple Frond Partners
Concentrated
11.7%
HOLD
Wedgewood Partners
Quality growth
6.9%
ADD
Polen Capital
Quality growth
6.7%
TRIM
AKO Capital
Concentrated
5.5%
TRIM
Yacktman Asset Management
Quality value
4.7%
ADD
Fundsmith
Concentrated
4.4%
TRIM
Eagle Capital
Quality value
4.2%
TRIM
Cantillon Capital
Concentrated
3.9%
TRIM
Tiger Global Management
Concentrated
3.5%
TRIM
Hound Partners
Concentrated
2.2%
ADD
Viking Global Investors
Concentrated
1.6%
TRIM
Markel Group
Concentrated
1.5%
HOLD
Davis Advisors
Concentrated
0.1%
ADD
Brave Warrior
Concentrated
0.0%
ADD
Horizon Kinetics
Franchise/inflation
0.0%
HOLD
Semper Augustus
Concentrated
0.0%
NEW
Giverny Capital
Quality compounder
0.0%
TRIM
Gardner Russo & Quinn
Graham/global value
0.0%
ADD
Ruane Cunniff / Sequoia
Quality compounder
0.0%
HOLD

Position size = share of that manager’s reported long US-equity portfolio. The consensus score weights each holder by quality tier, position size, and whether they were buying or trimming — then discounts very crowded names. It measures agreement among these managers, not expected return.