49
META
META PLATFORMS INC · Information Technology
Consensus score 49/100 · #12 this quarter · tier-weighted across tracked managers
Cluster buy: 3 tracked managers opened a new META position this quarter.
↑ConfirmedPrice action since filingas of 2026-07-10
vs 50-day avg
+11.5%
21-day momentum
+14.5%
recent volume
1.41×
13F filings lag ~45 days; this is current price/volume action on top — a technical read, not a prediction.
S2· AdvancingStage Analysis · Weinstein
vs 30-wk avg
+6.2%
30-wk MA slope
-0.8%
rel. strength
-17.2
52-wk range
54%
Advancing — above a rising 30-week trend with positive relative strength. Weinstein’s buy zone. Based on the 30-week (150-day) moving average + slope, Mansfield relative strength vs SPY, and volume. Technical read, not advice.
Holders
18
tracked managers
New this Q
3
opened a position
Avg weight
4.5%
of their portfolios
Combined value
$7.94B
held, at quarter-end
Who’s holding it Q1 2026, by position size
| Manager | Position size | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pershing Square Activist | 11.1% | $1.52B | HOLD |
| ValueAct Capital Concentrated | 9.2% | $524M | TRIM |
| Wedgewood Partners Quality growth | 7.8% | $38M | TRIM |
| Tiger Global Management Concentrated | 7.7% | $1.77B | ADD |
| Dorsey Asset Management Concentrated | 7.4% | $93M | ADD |
| Triple Frond Partners Concentrated | 7.0% | $67M | ADD |
| Giverny Capital Quality compounder | 6.4% | $176M | TRIM |
| Fundsmith Concentrated | 5.9% | $756M | TRIM |
| Davis Advisors Concentrated | 4.5% | $984M | TRIM |
| Eagle Capital Quality value | 2.5% | $753M | ADD |
| Third Point Activist | 2.5% | $51M | NEW |
| Ruane Cunniff / Sequoia Quality compounder | 1.9% | $115M | TRIM |
| Glenview Capital Concentrated | 1.9% | $70M | ADD |
| Polen Capital Quality growth | 1.9% | $273M | NEW |
| Viking Global Investors Concentrated | 1.7% | $608M | NEW |
| Markel Group Concentrated | 1.2% | $142M | HOLD |
| Brave Warrior Concentrated | 0.0% | $213K | ADD |
| Horizon Kinetics Franchise/inflation | 0.0% | $325K | HOLD |
Position size = share of that manager’s reported long US-equity portfolio. The consensus score weights each holder by quality tier, position size, and whether they were buying or trimming — then discounts very crowded names. It measures agreement among these managers, not expected return.