13F data — long US equity only · ~45-day lag from quarter-end · positions may have changed since · not investment advice
← Strongest buys
92

GOOGL

ALPHABET INC · Information Technology

Consensus score 92/100 · #2 this quarter · tier-weighted across tracked managers

→NeutralPrice action since filingas of 2026-10-14
vs 50-day avg
+0.7%
21-day momentum
+0.8%
recent volume
0.81×

13F filings lag ~45 days; this is current price/volume action on top — a technical read, not a prediction.

S3· ToppingStage Analysis · Weinstein
vs 30-wk avg
-0.0%
30-wk MA slope
+1.6%
rel. strength
-0.9
52-wk range
64%

Topping — momentum stalling at the highs; distribution risk. Based on the 30-week (150-day) moving average + slope, Mansfield relative strength vs SPY, and volume. Technical read, not advice.

Holders
23
tracked managers
New this Q
0
opened a position
Avg weight
5.2%
of their portfolios
Combined value
$36.13B
held, at quarter-end

Who’s holding it Q2 2026, by position size

ManagerPosition sizeChange
Himalaya Capital
Value/global
24.5%
HOLD
Lindsell Train
Concentrated
17.5%
TRIM
Ruane Cunniff / Sequoia
Quality compounder
11.1%
TRIM
Berkshire Hathaway
Quality compounder
9.4%
ADD
Wedgewood Partners
Quality growth
9.4%
TRIM
Cantillon Capital
Concentrated
9.2%
TRIM
Tiger Global Management
Concentrated
8.7%
TRIM
Third Point
Activist
7.9%
ADD
Fundsmith
Concentrated
4.6%
TRIM
Davis Advisors
Concentrated
4.5%
TRIM
Tweedy Browne
Graham/global value
3.8%
TRIM
Giverny Capital
Quality compounder
3.7%
TRIM
TCI Fund Management
Quality compounder
1.7%
HOLD
Markel Group
Concentrated
1.6%
HOLD
Eagle Capital
Quality value
0.9%
TRIM
Lone Pine Capital
Concentrated
0.5%
ADD
Altarock Partners
Quality compounder
0.4%
TRIM
Brave Warrior
Concentrated
0.2%
HOLD
Broad Run Investment Mgmt
Concentrated
0.1%
HOLD
Polen Capital
Quality growth
0.1%
TRIM
Gardner Russo & Quinn
Graham/global value
0.0%
TRIM
Semper Augustus
Concentrated
0.0%
HOLD
Horizon Kinetics
Franchise/inflation
0.0%
TRIM

Position size = share of that manager’s reported long US-equity portfolio. The consensus score weights each holder by quality tier, position size, and whether they were buying or trimming — then discounts very crowded names. It measures agreement among these managers, not expected return.