13F data — long US equity only · ~45-day lag from quarter-end · positions may have changed since · not investment advice
← Strongest buys
52

GOOG

ALPHABET INC · Information Technology

Consensus score 52/100 · #11 this quarter · tier-weighted across tracked managers

DivergingPrice action since filingas of 2026-07-10
vs 50-day avg
-4.0%
21-day momentum
-2.0%
recent volume
1.17×

13F filings lag ~45 days; this is current price/volume action on top — a technical read, not a prediction.

S2· AdvancingStage Analysis · Weinstein
vs 30-wk avg
+6.3%
30-wk MA slope
+2.6%
rel. strength
+12.1
52-wk range
78%

Advancing — above a rising 30-week trend with positive relative strength. Weinstein’s buy zone. Based on the 30-week (150-day) moving average + slope, Mansfield relative strength vs SPY, and volume. Technical read, not advice.

Holders
19
tracked managers
New this Q
2
opened a position
Avg weight
5.2%
of their portfolios
Combined value
$9.84B
held, at quarter-end

Who’s holding it Q1 2026, by position size

ManagerPosition sizeChange
Himalaya Capital
Value/global
22.0%
TRIM
Gardner Russo & Quinn
Graham/global value
11.3%
TRIM
Triple Frond Partners
Concentrated
10.5%
HOLD
Baupost Group
Deep value
6.6%
ADD
Markel Group
Concentrated
6.6%
HOLD
Giverny Capital
Quality compounder
6.5%
TRIM
Polen Capital
Quality growth
5.8%
TRIM
TCI Fund Management
Quality compounder
5.6%
ADD
Hosking Partners
Concentrated
4.9%
TRIM
Ruane Cunniff / Sequoia
Quality compounder
4.5%
TRIM
Eagle Capital
Quality value
4.4%
TRIM
Yacktman Asset Management
Quality value
4.3%
HOLD
Broad Run Investment Mgmt
Concentrated
2.8%
TRIM
Davis Advisors
Concentrated
0.9%
TRIM
Pershing Square
Activist
0.7%
TRIM
Berkshire Hathaway
Quality compounder
0.4%
NEW
Semper Augustus
Concentrated
0.1%
NEW
Brave Warrior
Concentrated
0.0%
HOLD
Horizon Kinetics
Franchise/inflation
0.0%
ADD

Position size = share of that manager’s reported long US-equity portfolio. The consensus score weights each holder by quality tier, position size, and whether they were buying or trimming — then discounts very crowded names. It measures agreement among these managers, not expected return.