90
GOOG
ALPHABET INC · Information Technology
Consensus score 90/100 · #3 this quarter · tier-weighted across tracked managers
→NeutralPrice action since filingas of 2026-10-14
vs 50-day avg
+1.2%
21-day momentum
+0.7%
recent volume
0.83×
13F filings lag ~45 days; this is current price/volume action on top — a technical read, not a prediction.
S3· ToppingStage Analysis · Weinstein
vs 30-wk avg
+0.4%
30-wk MA slope
+0.9%
rel. strength
-0.3
52-wk range
64%
Topping — momentum stalling at the highs; distribution risk. Based on the 30-week (150-day) moving average + slope, Mansfield relative strength vs SPY, and volume. Technical read, not advice.
Holders
18
tracked managers
New this Q
0
opened a position
Avg weight
6.0%
of their portfolios
Combined value
$20.12B
held, at quarter-end
Who’s holding it Q2 2026, by position size
| Manager | Position size | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Himalaya Capital Value/global | 23.4% | $866M | HOLD |
| Gardner Russo & Quinn Graham/global value | 12.1% | $1.08B | TRIM |
| Triple Frond Partners Concentrated | 9.2% | $103M | TRIM |
| Baupost Group Deep value | 9.0% | $485M | ADD |
| Markel Group Concentrated | 7.4% | $972M | HOLD |
| Giverny Capital Quality compounder | 7.2% | $214M | TRIM |
| TCI Fund Management Quality compounder | 6.7% | $3.51B | ADD |
| Polen Capital Quality growth | 6.6% | $765M | TRIM |
| Ruane Cunniff / Sequoia Quality compounder | 5.1% | $327M | TRIM |
| Hosking Partners Concentrated | 5.0% | $151M | TRIM |
| Yacktman Asset Management Quality value | 4.9% | $399M | HOLD |
| Eagle Capital Quality value | 4.4% | $1.43B | TRIM |
| Berkshire Hathaway Quality compounder | 3.2% | $9.61B | ADD |
| Broad Run Investment Mgmt Concentrated | 3.0% | $19M | TRIM |
| Davis Advisors Concentrated | 0.9% | $199M | TRIM |
| Semper Augustus Concentrated | 0.1% | $859K | HOLD |
| Brave Warrior Concentrated | 0.0% | $1M | HOLD |
| Horizon Kinetics Franchise/inflation | 0.0% | $1M | TRIM |
Position size = share of that manager’s reported long US-equity portfolio. The consensus score weights each holder by quality tier, position size, and whether they were buying or trimming — then discounts very crowded names. It measures agreement among these managers, not expected return.