100
AMZN
AMAZON.COM INC · Consumer Discretionary
Consensus score 100/100 · #1 this quarter · tier-weighted across tracked managers
→NeutralPrice action since filingas of 2026-07-10
vs 50-day avg
-3.4%
21-day momentum
+0.5%
recent volume
1.41×
13F filings lag ~45 days; this is current price/volume action on top — a technical read, not a prediction.
S3· ToppingStage Analysis · Weinstein
vs 30-wk avg
+4.3%
30-wk MA slope
+0.2%
rel. strength
-1.6
52-wk range
60%
Topping — momentum stalling at the highs; distribution risk. Based on the 30-week (150-day) moving average + slope, Mansfield relative strength vs SPY, and volume. Technical read, not advice.
Holders
20
tracked managers
New this Q
0
opened a position
Avg weight
8.1%
of their portfolios
Combined value
$13.14B
held, at quarter-end
Who’s holding it Q1 2026, by position size
| Manager | Position size | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Altarock Partners Quality compounder | 38.2% | $1.58B | ADD |
| Third Point Activist | 19.4% | $404M | TRIM |
| Pershing Square Activist | 17.4% | $2.39B | ADD |
| Baupost Group Deep value | 12.7% | $650M | ADD |
| ValueAct Capital Concentrated | 10.5% | $601M | TRIM |
| Triple Frond Partners Concentrated | 10.4% | $100M | HOLD |
| Tiger Global Management Concentrated | 9.1% | $2.08B | HOLD |
| Eagle Capital Quality value | 8.2% | $2.45B | TRIM |
| AKO Capital Concentrated | 7.1% | $361M | HOLD |
| Glenview Capital Concentrated | 6.0% | $221M | ADD |
| Polen Capital Quality growth | 5.6% | $812M | TRIM |
| Wedgewood Partners Quality growth | 4.3% | $21M | ADD |
| Markel Group Concentrated | 3.5% | $423M | HOLD |
| Davis Advisors Concentrated | 3.3% | $713M | HOLD |
| Hosking Partners Concentrated | 2.8% | $79M | TRIM |
| Hound Partners Concentrated | 2.2% | $17M | ADD |
| Viking Global Investors Concentrated | 0.7% | $249M | TRIM |
| Brave Warrior Concentrated | 0.0% | $292K | HOLD |
| Horizon Kinetics Franchise/inflation | 0.0% | $247K | TRIM |
| Gardner Russo & Quinn Graham/global value | 0.0% | $217K | HOLD |
Position size = share of that manager’s reported long US-equity portfolio. The consensus score weights each holder by quality tier, position size, and whether they were buying or trimming — then discounts very crowded names. It measures agreement among these managers, not expected return.